Radio DelEuZe: writes? breath and hand

4.30.2012

writes? breath and hand

_________________________________________________________________

1.who writes? the crippled hand or the voice?
2. speaks crippled hand. ash to gray. notice. a thing between blogs and mouth. day night to

3. in the fall of 1977 we arrived again in france, -----paris hearing electric teaching 4.Vincennes between bodies of processual moving--- You are young! sHE saying this as gasping for air not the violet of the speaking moment, not the violence of the speakless moment flooded by the tune of air. and hair as with mister Nashe's proem.a wordfound discoved and made by this present inventor.

i arrived in tthat country last week. under crate and package. o dont speak to me of voices. and radio. as wireless wave of country and control

password

not master word

__________radio switch here.

pass that password pass

pass

not keep

----------------------------------------------------escaping the oedipii
(bricoleur) handyman ~

pass not creep

pass a pastiche

a frame dangle reference

push right le----------------------------________________________

___________________________

______________________________

_AnD______as_______for___

As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.

For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a questin of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..

Professor DChallanger speaking

in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind

__________AnD What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics.

_____

__________AnD

What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics. my book on Kant’s different; I like it, I did it as a book about an enemy, a book about an enemy tries to show how his system works, how its various cogs-the tribunal of reason… but I suppose the main way I coped with it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of buggery or it comes to the same thing, immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind taking an author from behind and giving him a child that would be his own offsprings, yet monstrous. It was really important for it to be his own child, cuz the author had to actually say all I had him saying,

but the child was bound to be monstrous too, cuz it resulted from all sorts of shifting, slipping, dislocation and hidden emissions…

_____AnD