
Æ - Ruines et Cendresndrea Mantegna (1431-1506)
Saint Sébastien
Huile sur toile, 255 x 140 cm
RF 1766
Photo :J .G. Berizzi
Louvre, Paris, France
Copyright Réunion des Musées Nationaux /
Art Resource, NY
__Audition selves charmed by his Master's Voice. Metaphor becomes Reality. Ways of Escape____
---------------------------------
magic video. too bad d.motion's gotten stupid and one cannot de_tach unrelated vids.
but their idear of rhizome . knot samilar to our PersonaFictations
Crying, or causing tears to flow, and provoking laughter are the functions of certain images. Yo u can cry because it's too beautiful or too intense. The only thing that bugs me is the knowing laughter of the cinephiles. This kind of laughter is supposedly on some higher level. I'd rather see the whole house in tears. How could you not cry at Griffith's Broken Blossoms? -- Gilles Delueze from "Portrait of the Philosopher as Moviegoer"Thank you Papa Deleuze for telling me this ~ I am so happy. I gonna cry ... shed tear of treatment permission.... bceause I cry O cry I cry tear. Some film. they make you weep. cry.s ob. Lobster tears. alligator tear, crocodile tears.BooHoo!
image still fritz lang
As for the method of deconstruction of texts I see clearly what it is, I admire it a lot, but it has nothing to do with my own method. I do not present myself as a commentator on texts.
For me, a text is merely a small cog in an extra-textual practice. It is not a question of commenting on the text by a method of deconstruction, or by a method of textual practice, or by other methods; it is a questin of what use it has in an extra-textual practice that prolongs the text ..
Professor DChallanger speaking
in Clinical Critical terms as the hat was in the wind
_
What I most detested was Hegelianism and dialectics. my book on Kant’s different; I like it, I did it as a book about an enemy, a book about an enemy tries to show how his system works, how its various cogs-the tribunal of reason… but I suppose the main way I coped with it at the time was to see the history of philosophy as a sort of buggery or it comes to the same thing, immaculate conception. I saw myself as taking an author from behind taking an author from behind and giving him a child that would be his own offsprings, yet monstrous. It was really important for it to be his own child, cuz the author had to actually say all I had him saying,
but the child was bound to be monstrous too, cuz it resulted from all sorts of shifting, slipping, dislocation and hidden emissions…
Le but, ce n’est pas de répondre à des questions, c’est de sortir, c’est d’en sortir.
G. VELTSOS: En ce sens-là vous êtes ami avec Deleuze parce que vous créez ensemble un monde ?
F. G. : C’est ça. Mais comme je le disais dans une interview, je suis ami avec Deleuze mais je ne suis pas copain. Je ne sais pas comment l’on pourrait traduire ça. Parce que, par exemple, avec Deleuze on s’est toujours vouvoyé, on a toujours gardé une grande proximité et une grande distance amicale. Comme si l’on en avait besoin, précisément, pour maintenir la consistance de notre tapisserie commune. (...)
radio deleuze by Clifford Duffy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.